JETS 41:3 (September 1998) p. 390 might actually learn something about how to advance the discussion of those differences. The Ladd critique also missed the point, understandable as it was to make. Our goal was not to argue that the initial fulfillments of the NT redefined terms in such a way that they no longer meant what they had seemed to mean in the OT. Nor do we argue for a refining of meaning that in effect changes the meaning from what it originally appeared to be. Sensus plenior was not what